Supreme Court of Colorado· 8/20/1984
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. State
Citations
- 690 P.2d 177
- 1984 Colo. LEXIS 593
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that for standing, the Equal Protection Clause protects against both ingenious and open discrimination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dubofsky, Lohr, Erickson, Neighbors
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1991-02-04· cited 212×
- Robles v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1991-05-20· cited 67×
- City of Aspen v. MeseroleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-12-24· cited 27×
- Div. of Alcoholic Bev. v. McKesson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 21×
- Riverton Produce Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-04-04· cited 21×
- United States Transmission Systems, Inc. v. Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-03-17· cited 18×
- Colorado Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Pueblo CountyColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-03-11· cited 15×
- Hyland Hills Park & Recreation District v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-12-13· cited 10×
- Matter of Estate of HillColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-12-05· cited 7×
- McLane Western, Inc. v. Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-05-05· cited 6×
- Western Refining Corp. v. State, Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals· 1988-09-15· cited 5×
- Sanderson v. Allstate InsuranceD. Colorado· 1990-05-29· cited 2×
- Plettner v. AlmonColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-12-05· cited 1×
- No.Colorado Attorney General Reports· 1995-02-17
- No.Colorado Attorney General Reports· 1991-06-03
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 4,065×
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-06-07· cited 3,450×
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court· 1970-03-02· cited 2,056×
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court· 1942-11-09· cited 1,246×
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 1,109×
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1978-06-23· cited 899×
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 846×
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court· 1966-02-23· cited 762×
- United States v. GuestSupreme Court· 1966-04-04· cited 721×
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 606×
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court· 1935-03-04· cited 581×
- Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 448×
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonSupreme Court· 1951-01-15· cited 445×
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-01-12· cited 387×
- Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma CountySupreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 352×
- Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 289×
- Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado· 1977-10-11· cited 220×
- Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 170×
- Best & Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1940-12-23· cited 151×
Other cases named Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. State
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.