Skip to main content

Arce v. State

Citations

  • 762 So. 2d 1003
  • 2000 WL 873338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a habitual offender sentence is not subject to the sentencing guidelines; therefore, defendant was not entitled to relief pursuant to Heggs
  • holding that a habitual offender sentence is not subject to the sentencing guidelines; therefore, appellant not entitled to relief pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000)
  • affirming the denial of motion to correct sentence under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000) where defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender
  • affirming the denial of motion to correct sentence under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000) where defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender
  • affirming denial of motion to correct sentence where the defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender to a twenty-year prison term; noting that under section 775.084(4)(e), a habitual offender sentence is not subject to the guidelines provisions of section 921.001
  • appel-lant sentenced under habitual offender statute not entitled to Heggs relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.