Second Circuit· 8/1/2008

Arar v. Ashcroft

Citations

532 F.3d 157
2008 WL 2574470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing “that past holdings of our Court, as well as those of our sister courts of appeals, strongly suggest that TVPA actions may in fact be brought by non‐U.S. citizens,” and collecting authorities
“Determining the existence of subject matter jurisdiction is a threshold inquiry, and a claim is ‘properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1
\Determining the existence of subject matter jurisdiction is a threshold inquiry\
“[T]he district court may examine evidence outside of the pleadings to [determine if subject matter jurisdiction exists].”
“[T]he district court may examine evidence outside of the pleadings to make th[e] determination” of whether subject matter jurisdiction exists
Sack,concurring in part and dissenting in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Cabranes, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

141 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.