Apkin v. Treasurer & Receiver General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ADEA did not preempt the state law of mandatory retirement as to the plaintiff in that case
• holding that the ADEA did not preempt the state law of mandatory retirement as to the plaintiff in that case
• holding Federal legislation, in absence of clear congressional intent, does not preempt State constitutional mandate for judges' retirement at age seventy
• holding Federal legislation, in absence of clear congressional intent, does not preempt State constitutional mandate for judges’ retirement at age seventy
• holding appointed judges not protected because state constitutional provision requiring retirement at age seventy found not preempted by ADEA
• holding appointed judges not protected because state constitutional provision requiring retirement at age seventy found not preempted by ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).