Skip to main content
· 5/14/1986

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Frank J. TRABUCCO, Et Al., Defendants, Appellees

Citations

  • 791 F.2d 1
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25101
  • 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,222
  • 40 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \an issue of law must have been heard and decided\ to constitute binding precedent
  • “Thus, the issue in the case at bar was addressed by Mahoney in his litigation, even if not as thoroughly as the EEOC would have desired.”
  • “We have found no case, nor has appellant cited us to any, that supports its contention that a weak or ineffective presentation in a prior ease deprives the ruling of precedential effect.”
  • stare decisis not narrowly confined to parties and privies, its broad impact reaches strangers to earlier litigation
  • “[W]e would not relish the prospect of evaluating the effectiveness of factual presentation and argument as a precondition of ... determining whether or not to accord stare decisis effect to an issue that has been raised and decided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ald-Rich, Campbell, Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.