· 8/17/1999
William Sapperstein v. Robert Hager and Patricia Hager Doing Business as B & G Cyclery
Citations
- 188 F.3d 852
- 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 933
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 19042
- 1999 WL 623907
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that district court abused discretion in granting motion to dismiss where plaintiff had no opportunity to challenge credibility of defendant’s evidence submitted in support of motion
- reversing dismissal for lack of jurisdiction based on affidavit plaintiff never had opportunity to challenge
- reversing dismissal for lack of jurisdiction based on affidavit plaintiff never had opportunity to challenge
- describing the policy rationale for allowing FLSA retaliation claims to be based on good faith but mistaken complaints
- reversing dismissal for lack of jurisdiction based on affidavit plaintiff never had opportunity to challenge
- questioning credibility determinations based solely on affidavits in determining subject matter jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Manion, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.