Skip to main content
· 8/17/1999

William Sapperstein v. Robert Hager and Patricia Hager Doing Business as B & G Cyclery

Citations

  • 188 F.3d 852
  • 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 933
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 19042
  • 1999 WL 623907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that district court abused discretion in granting motion to dismiss where plaintiff had no opportunity to challenge credibility of defendant’s evidence submitted in support of motion
  • reversing dismissal for lack of jurisdiction based on affidavit plaintiff never had opportunity to challenge
  • reversing dismissal for lack of jurisdiction based on affidavit plaintiff never had opportunity to challenge
  • describing the policy rationale for allowing FLSA retaliation claims to be based on good faith but mistaken complaints
  • reversing dismissal for lack of jurisdiction based on affidavit plaintiff never had opportunity to challenge
  • questioning credibility determinations based solely on affidavits in determining subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Manion, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.