Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Illinois Supreme Court· 1/30/1992

Antunes v. Sookhakitch

Citations

  • 588 N.E.2d 1111
  • 146 Ill. 2d 477
  • 167 Ill. Dec. 981
  • 1992 Ill. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court must examine a statute as a whole, including looking at each section in connection with the other sections, to determine the legislative intent
  • holding that a court must examine a statute as a whole, including looking at each section in connection with the other sections, to determine the legislative intent
  • holding that a court must examine a statute as a whole, including looking at each section in connection with the other sections, to determine the legislative intent
  • referring to subsection (b) of section 13—212 as containing an eight-year repose period
  • referring to subsection (b) of section 13-212 as containing an eight-year repose period
  • referring to subsection (b) of section 13-212 as containing an eight-year repose period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Antunes v. Sookhakitch

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.