Wagner v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• post-trial motion stating only that trial court “improperly instructed the jury” was without specificity and resulted in waiver of issue for review
• “A jury’s award will not be subject to remittitur where it falls within the ‘flexible range’ of conclusions which can be reasonably supported by the facts.”
• jury question whether plaintiffs alleged speeding, defendant’s alleged negligence in failing to post proper road signs, or both proximately caused automobile collision
• “[d]amages are peculiarly an issue of fact for a jury to determine and are subject to reversal [only] when excessive”
• jury question whether plaintiff's alleged speeding, defendant's alleged negligence in failing to post proper road signs, or both proximately caused automobile collision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).