Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that previously cited appellate court cases were overruled to the extent they conflicted with the supreme court’s decision
• stating that where an issue can be resolved by statutory and case law interpretation, it falls within a court’s expertise and not an administrative agency’s
• finding that several sections of the Act indicated that the legislature intended for aggrieved parties to exhaust all administrative remedies before seeking judicial review
• noting that previously cited appellate court cases were overruled to the extent they conflicted with the supreme court's decision
• recognizing several - 10 - 2020 IL App (2d) 190515-U exceptions to the exhaustion requirement, including where it is patently futile to seek relief before the agency
• noting that doctrine “conserves valuable judicial time by avoiding piecemeal appeals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).