Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1/19/1973

Antonellis v. Northgate Construction Corp.

Citations

291 N.E.2d 626
362 Mass. 847
1973 Mass. LEXIS 370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

The “[paragraph [in question] is not self-interpreting . . . and the evidence could be received and used to elucidate its meaning in context”
even absent specific evaluation of evidence by trial judge, finding of non-integration upheld as not clearly erroneous
no integration intended in parties’ one-page agreement and “evident design to mesh” with contingency
“Whether there was an integration as the plaintiffs contended was a question of the intention of the parties on which proof could be received ranging beyond the writing proper.”
\Whether there was an integration . . . was a question of the intention of the parties on which proof could be received ranging beyond the writing proper\
“[the disputed provision] is not self-interpreting ■ — • no form of words is — and the evidence could be received and used to elucidate its meaning in context”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Reardon, Hennessey, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.