Davis v. Dawson, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The granting of Local 400’s motion to dismiss based on plaintiff's failure to state a breach of duty claim necessarily defeats plaintiff's federal claim against Safeway.”
• “Damages constitute an essential element to [a] breach of contract claim.”
• \Parties to an agreement can ... insert a time is of the essence clause into an agreement and thereby make performance at the specified time essential to one's right to require performance of the other party.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Parties to an agreement can . . . insert a time is of the essence clause into an agreement and thereby make performance at the specified time essential to one’s right to require performance of the other party.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[P]laintiff’s claims of fraud or false statements under 18 16 U.S.C. § 1001 and conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 241 are also barred because these criminal 17 statutes do not expressly create a private right of action upon which plaintiff may sue 18 defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).