Skip to main content
· 5/13/1983

Thomas O'Connor & Co. v. City of Medford

Citations

  • 448 N.E.2d 1276
  • 16 Mass. App. Ct. 10
  • 40 A.L.R. 4th 988
  • 1983 Mass. App. LEXIS 1332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • imposing penalty interest under § 39K, where authority failed to dispute contract amount in manner required by statute
  • statutory prohibition upon municipality incurring a liability relates to municipal finance, and will not shield the city from liability for contract breach
  • “General Laws c. 44, §31 relates to municipal finance and is not, we think, intended to extend the doctrine of municipal liability so as to leave contractors entirely without remedy for breach of contract in the absence of an appropriation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greaney, Kaplan, Dreben

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.