D.C. Circuit· 8/26/2016

Antoine Jones v. Steve Kirchner

Citations

835 F.3d 74
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that officers exceeded the authorization of the warrant by executing the search warrant at the defendant’s home at 4:45 a.m. when the warrant expressly stated that a search was not to occur before 6:00 a.m.
clarifying that the court was not holding that “neither of two alternative bases for a holding can estop a party from re-litigating an issue in a future action”
arguing the office environment and com- munication between FEMA’s leadership indicates Hubbard was aware of Harris’ EEO activities
applying the statute of limitations imposed by District of Columbia law to a § 1983 claim brought in the District of Columbia even though the alleged constitutional tort occurred in Maryland
affirming dismissal of a complaint on qualified-im- munity grounds when the plaintiff had not shown that the right at issue was clearly established at the time of the purported violation
applying D.C. statute of limitations in a Section 1983 action brought here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Ginsburg, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.