S.H. v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[b]ecause we find that Local 402 did request an appeal to the IEB, we reverse the district court’s judgment and remand the case for an internal appeal to the IEB”
• experts’ assumption that asbestos exposure occurred could not create a 4 dispute of material fact where the assumption was unsupported by any “evidence about exactly 5 what happened at the [alleged location of the exposure] in the [relevant years]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).