Skip to main content

Anthony v. State

Citations

  • 638 S.E.2d 877
  • 282 Ga. App. 457
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3685
  • 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that failure to object to alleged victim impact testimony did not constitute ineffective assistance, where the objection would have been meritless
  • holding statements admissible because “‘the inquiry was simply whether the [witness] noticed any particular actions or statements that indicated deception, not whether she found the [victim] believable or credible’”
  • holding statements admissible because “ ‘the inquiry was simply whether the [witness] noticed any particular actions or statements that indicated deception, not whether she found the (victim) believable or credible’ ”
  • trial court properly admitted testimony that victim did not exhibit any behaviors indicative of deception during interview
  • officer’s testimony that victim exhibited no signs of deception during interview did not constitute bolstering
  • officer’s testimony that victim exhibited no signs of deception during interview did not constitute bolstering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Johnson, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.