Frey v. the State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant had three qualifying ACCA convictions and explaining: “Because we apply the modified categorical approach . . . , we can look at . . . the PSR’s undisputed factfindings to deter- mine which statutory subsection he was convicted under.”
• denying an application for leave to file a second or successive section 2255 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).