Darville v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s contention that counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the omission of a particular jury instruction on felony murder was moot because the appellant was found “guilty of malice murder and no conviction was entered on the felony murder charge”
• defendant’s contention that counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the omission of a particular jury instruction on felony murder was moot because defendant was found guilty of malice murder and no conviction was entered on the felony murder charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).