Skip to main content
· 9/26/2019

Anthony Reynaldo Martinez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that expert testimony was unhelpful where “it did not offer anything the jury could not discern on its own”
  • holding that expert testimony was unhelpful where “it did not offer anything the jury could not discern on its own”
  • finding the district court correctly observed that the qualified immunity analysis is limited to the facts that were knowable to the defendant officers at the time they engaged in the conduct at issue
  • discussing the Daubert reliability factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.