Skip to main content

Rubio v. State

Citations

  • 241 S.W.3d 1
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1125
  • 2007 WL 2621181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the State’s witness’s statement likely contributed to the jury’s conviction and thus the error clearly prejudiced the defendant’s case
  • stating that any Confrontation Clause violation is subject to harmless error analysis
  • stating that any Confrontation Clause violation is subject to harmless error analysis
  • ―Evidence of the defendant‘s guilt should be considered, but that is only one factor in the [harm] analysis.‖
  • “Evidence of the defendant’s guilt should be considered, but that is only one factor in the [harm] analysis.”
  • “[A] ny Confrontation Clause violation, once proven, is subject to harmless error analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, Price, Johnson, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Keasler, Hervey, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.