Anthony J. Larette v. Paul Delo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding counsel’s decision not to pursue competency defense was reasonable where defendant insisted he was competent at time of offense and instructed counsel not to pursue such a defense
• scope of mandatory review is a question of state law, issues falling outside that scope may not be deemed presented to the state courts
• counsel’s decision not to pursue competency defense reasonable where defendant insisted he was competent at time of offense and instructed counsel not to pursue such a defense
• counsel not ineffective where clients opposed efforts to produce mental health mitigation evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).