Skip to main content
· 1/11/2013

Anthony Charboneau, III v. United States

Citations

  • 702 F.3d 1132
  • 2013 WL 133190
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that appellant's emphasis on an alleged structural error did not affect its plain-error inquiry because \[w]hether an error can be properly characterized as 'structural' has nothing to do with plain error review\
  • “As we explained in Roe v. Delo, 160 F.3d 416, 418 (8th Cir. 1998

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.