Skip to main content
· 10/30/1998

Richard Roe v. Paul K. Delo Jeremiah (Jay) W. Nixon

Citations

  • 160 F.3d 416
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27803
  • 1998 WL 754991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affidavit by counsel that claim was omitted on appeal not as the result of a strategic decision, but as the result of oversight, negated presumption of competence
  • “The decision to forgo a plain error claim is usually the result of a reasonable winnowing of weaker appellate claims.”
  • “The- decision to forgo a plain error claim is usually the result of a reasonable winnowing of weaker appellate claims.”
  • courts recognize \more rigorous\ plain error standard is appropriate where federal -7- constitutional error has not been properly preserved
  • affidavit by counsel that claim was omitted on appeal not as the result of a strategic decision, but as the result of oversight, negated presumption of competence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Loken, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.