Javier Perez-Palafox v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the BIA did not engage in improper fact-finding, where it “completely accepted” the undisputed facts of the case
• concluding that no impermissible factfinding occurred when the BIA applied the law to the facts found by the IJ
• noting that the IJ relied on an incorrect interpretation of law when declining to consider a police report under the Anaya-Ortiz “all reliable evidence” rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).