Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 76 So. 3d 379
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20857
  • 2011 WL 6847813

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an instruction which “gutted” the defendant’s key defense was so erroneous as to affect the verdict
  • finding fundamental error where forcible felony instruction negated defendant’s key defense for his use of nondeadly force
  • revers ing conviction for aggravated battery where the improper forcible felony instruction “gutted Appellant’s key defense and very likely confused the jury” in a classic “he said/she said” case
  • “Self-defense is ‘an affirmative defense that has the effect of legally excusing the defendant from an act that would otherwise be a criminal offense.’” (quoting Mosansky v. State, 33 So.3d 756, 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Ray, Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.