Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• compensability \does not depend on demonstrable submission to the employer's right to direction and control at the precise moment in time that the injury was sustained\
• in light of no-fault nature of workers’ compensation law, misconduct on the job relating to the method of accomplishing the work task does not take task beyond the course of employment
• an employee’s violation of an employment rule does not render the claim noncompensable
• explaining relationship between ORS 656.005(7)(a) and ORS 656.005(7)(b)(B)
• explaining relationship between ORS 656.005(7)(a) and ORS 656.005(7)(b)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).