Skip to main content
· 2/25/1994

Norpac Foods, Inc. v. Gilmore

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 1373
  • 318 Or. 363
  • 1994 Ore. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting view that injury in employer’s parking lot is per se compensable
  • “In assessing the compensability of an injury, we must evaluate the work-connection of both elements', neither is dispositive.” (Emphasis added.)
  • the unitary work-connection test is designed to assess the sufficiency of the relationship between a claimant’s injury and employment
  • “ ‘arising out of and ‘in the course of are two elements of a single inquiry”
  • “When an employee traveling to or from work sustains an injury ‘on or near’ the employer’s premises, the ‘in the course of’ portion of the work- connection test may be satisfied if the employer exercises some ‘control’ over the place where the injury is sustained.”
  • “When an employee traveling to or from work sustains an injury ‘on or near’ the employer’s premises, the ‘in the course of’ portion of the work- connection test may be satisfied if the employer exercises some ‘control’ over the place where the injury is sustained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomis-Sen, Fadeley, Unis, Graher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.