· 2/25/1994
Norpac Foods, Inc. v. Gilmore
Citations
- 867 P.2d 1373
- 318 Or. 363
- 1994 Ore. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting view that injury in employer’s parking lot is per se compensable
- “In assessing the compensability of an injury, we must evaluate the work-connection of both elements', neither is dispositive.” (Emphasis added.)
- the unitary work-connection test is designed to assess the sufficiency of the relationship between a claimant’s injury and employment
- “ ‘arising out of and ‘in the course of are two elements of a single inquiry”
- “When an employee traveling to or from work sustains an injury ‘on or near’ the employer’s premises, the ‘in the course of’ portion of the work- connection test may be satisfied if the employer exercises some ‘control’ over the place where the injury is sustained.”
- “When an employee traveling to or from work sustains an injury ‘on or near’ the employer’s premises, the ‘in the course of’ portion of the work- connection test may be satisfied if the employer exercises some ‘control’ over the place where the injury is sustained.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomis-Sen, Fadeley, Unis, Graher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.