Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he unitary work-connection test does not supply a mechanical formula for determining whether an injury is compensable.”
• prior case law interpreting the same statutory wording considered at first level of statutory interpretation
• independently reviewing and reversing the board’s determination that an employee’s injury had not arisen out of and in the course of employment
• prior case law interpreting the same statutory wording considered at first level of statutory interpretation
• statutory context includes \prior case law from this court that interprets the same statutory wording \ (emphasis added)
• referring to exams under the statute as “compelled medical examinations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).