Andrew L. Smith v. Jack R. Ayres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where relevant telephone calls were all intrastate, there was no act that could have constituted wire fraud
• explaining that where relevant telephone calls were all intrastate, there was no act that could have constituted wire fraud
• Ute presumption warranted only under subsections one and three of Rule 10b-5, but not under subsection two

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).