Cofacredit, S.A. v. Windsor Plumbing Supply Co. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiff must show an agreement, an overt act in furtherance of that agreement and membership in the conspiracy by each defendant
• finding allegations of activity over a period of 1 xk years insufficient to establish closed-ended continuity
• predi cate acts of mail and wire fraud over approximately eleven months spanned insufficient time to demonstrate closed-end continuity
• “A conspirator must intend to further an endeavor which, if completed, would satisfy all of the elements of a substantive criminal offense ....”
• “[T]he duration of a pattern of racketeering activity is measured by the RICO predicate acts the defendants commit.”
• “an ‘inherently terminable’ scheme does not imply the threat of continued racketeering activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).