State v. Ruff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Denial of a post-conviction motion for DNA testing is reviewed to determine whether the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mercer v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2017-03-14· cited 8×
• State of Missouri v. Ardell Fields
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-07-19· cited 5×
• Belcher v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-02-07· cited 4×
• HAFFEY v. State
  Montana Supreme Court· 2010-05-04· cited 3×
• State of Missouri v. Patricia Prewitt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-05-21· cited 3×
• Hamilton v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-08-13· cited 3×
• Fields v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-03-25· cited 3×
• State v. Belcher
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-05-13· cited 2×
• Kenneth Williams v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-08-30· cited 2×
• Eddie Greer v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-04-26· cited 1×
• Mercer v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-03-16· cited 1×
• Ardell Fields v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-03-25
• State of Missouri v. Fred L. Harris
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-03-23
• State v. Hickerson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-10-22
• State of Missouri v. John W. Caudill
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2023-09-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weeks v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-08-03· cited 86×
• People v. Urioste
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-21· cited 49×
• Anderson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2003-09-04· cited 18×
• Richardson v. Richardson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2007-03-20· cited 12×
• State v. Donovan
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-06-29· cited 6×