Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 743 N.E.2d 1273
  • 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 492
  • 2001 WL 258052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that denial of a motion to separate witnesses is harmless if, in light of all the evidence in the case, the error is sufficiently minor so as to not affect the defendant’s substantial rights
  • holding the trial court’s erroneous denial of motion for separation of witnesses did not affect defendant’s substantial rights because there was no evidence that any witnesses were in the courtroom for the testimony of other witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Sharpnack, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.