O'NEILL v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by sentencing the defendant to the presumptive sentence despite the defendant's proposed five mitigating factors
• “[A] judge who imposes the presumptive sentence is under no obligation to explain his reasons through the delineation of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-04-27· cited 44×
• Mann v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-02-19· cited 25×
• Espinoza v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-12-27· cited 23×
• Storey v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-22· cited 21×
• Wilkie v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-08-18· cited 21×
• Page v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-26· cited 19×
• Michael Norris v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-11-14· cited 11×
• Dylak v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-06· cited 7×
• Anderson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-03-16· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Legue v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-04· cited 53×
• Bray v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-02-11· cited 34×
• Harrison v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-08-24· cited 22×
• Wilson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-18· cited 20×
• Wingett v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-09-27· cited 14×
• Enamorado v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-02· cited 12×
• Pettiford v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-04-29· cited 12×
• Magers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-09-28· cited 11×