Perez v. ATLANTA CHECK CASHERS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lack of evidence establishing class-wide lack of consent supported trial court’s determination that class certification was inappropriate
• indicating that an individual would have a cause of action for financial identity fraud
• explaining that party may not use reply brief to expand enumerations of error
• before a trial court can certify the class, the plaintiff must show that she satisfied the threshold factors
• “[A] [p]arty may not use his reply brief to expand his enumeration of errors by arguing the incorrectness of a trial court’s ruling not mentioned in the enumeration”
• “Because the trial court considered the merits of [the] claims only to the extent necessary to conduct the predominance inquiry [of the class-certification analysis], the court committed no error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).