Skip to main content

Anderson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2011 VT 17
  • 19 A.3d 86
  • 189 Vt. 603
  • 2011 Vt. LEXIS 16
  • 2011 WL 478571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an award of attorney’s fees was erroneous because the plaintiffs’ lawsuit “yielded no relief to plaintiffs, vindicated no significant legal rights, and advanced no broader public goals”
  • finding that an award of attorney’s fees was erroneous because the plaintiffs’ lawsuit “yielded no relief to plaintiffs, vindicated no significant legal rights, and advanced no broader public goals”
  • using Hensley and Farrar as persuasive authority
  • using Hensley and Farrar as persuasive authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.