N.D. Illinois· 7/14/1999
Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Computer Systems Solutions, Inc.
Citations
- 188 F.R.D. 280
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, “[ujndue prejudice occurs when the amendment ‘brings in entirely new and separate claims, adds new parties, or at least entails more than an alternative claim or a change in the allegations of the complaint’ ”
- denying motion to amend complaint where party “failed to meet its burden of showing some valid reason for delay”
- denying a motion to amend where the defendant “failed to meet its burden of showing some valid reason for delay”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Graham v. Progressive Direct InsuranceW.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-09-15· cited 48×
- Paloian v. Grupo Serla S.A. De C v. (In Re GGSI Liquidation Inc.)N.D. Illinois· 2006-09-07· cited 17×
- King v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-10-23· cited 7×
- Jacobs v. Xerox Corp. Long Term Disability Income PlanN.D. Illinois· 2007-10-15· cited 6×
- Tetra Tech Amt v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2016-08-11· cited 4×
- Robledo v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2008-10-06
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
- Perkins v. SilversteinSeventh Circuit· 1991-08-07· cited 233×
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellSecond Circuit· 1990-12-10· cited 186×
- Harry F. Chaveriat, Jr. v. Williams Pipe Line CompanySeventh Circuit· 1993-12-21· cited 161×
- Denise Sanders v. Venture Stores, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1995-05-23· cited 127×
- Armando Villa v. City of Chicago, Jane Byrne and Carol Witherell-NiecSeventh Circuit· 1991-02-08· cited 107×
- Sharon Campbell v. Ingersoll Milling MacHine Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Henry Ortland, IndividuallySeventh Circuit· 1990-01-23· cited 89×
- Tragarz v. Keene Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1992-11-06· cited 85×
- Sidney Jones v. Counselor Hamelman, Sgt. Hampton, Officer Likens, and Officer SwainSeventh Circuit· 1989-02-22· cited 73×
- Merrill Ferguson, Stephen W. Dils, Gail W. Dils, as Trustee for the Dils Trust v. Richard Roberts and Roberts & Ellsworth, Ltd.Seventh Circuit· 1993-12-08· cited 71×
- Anthony J. Amendola v. Gary R. BayerSeventh Circuit· 1990-07-24· cited 69×
- Walid A. Hindo v. University of Health Sciences/the Chicago Medical SchoolSeventh Circuit· 1995-09-06· cited 68×
- Tamari v. Bache & Company Lebanon)Seventh Circuit· 1988-01-20· cited 41×
- A. Cherney Disposal Co. v. Chicago & Suburban Refuse Disposal Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1975-08-19· cited 32×
- Tenneco Resins, Inc., Tenneco Eastern Realty, Inc. v. Reeves Brothers, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1985-01-10· cited 26×
- Johnson v. Methodist Medical Center of IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1993-12-01· cited 10×
- Lanigan v. Lasalle National BankN.D. Illinois· 1985-11-14· cited 9×
- Skokie Gold Standard Liquors, Inc. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1983-09-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.