Skip to main content
· 2/8/1991

Armando Villa v. City of Chicago, Jane Byrne and Carol Witherell-Niec

Citations

  • 924 F.2d 629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that although amendment is discretionary, it should be denied when it would be futile
  • applying an abuse of discretion standard when analyzing the district court's decision to deny a party's motion for leave to amend
  • applying an abuse of discretion standard when analyzing the district court's decision to deny a party's motion for leave to amend
  • applying an abuse of discretion standard when analyzing the district court's decision to deny a party's motion for leave to amend after the deadline to do so set in that case
  • where no new facts or changes of law warranted the filing of an amended complaint, the district court’s decision to deny leave to amend upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Coffey, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.