Walid A. Hindo v. University of Health Sciences/the Chicago Medical School

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that knowledge is required under the FCA and that mistake or negligence is not enough
• finding that a claim was not fraudulent where there was no contention the work was not done
• finding that government knowledge and disclosure by the contractor is relevant because in order for an FCA violation to occur, “the claim must be a lie”
• noting that “[i]nnocent mistakes or negligence are not actionable” as false claims
• noting that “[i]nnocent mistakes or negligence are not actionable” as false claims
• “[a] denial is particularly warranted in instances in which the plaintiff has failed to provide an explanation as to why the amendment did not take place sooner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).