Ameristone Tile, LLC v. Ceramic Consulting Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]onduct that affects only the parties to the transaction and not the public interest provides no basis for a SCUTPA claim.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• complaint stated claim for conversion where defendants delivered certain tile samples to third party without Plaintiff’s consent as samples were “its business assets and property that it had title over”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).