CFA Institute v. Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the reasonable foreseeability of litigation in the forum state weighed in favor of constitutional reasonableness
• concluding that a defendant engaging in 13 years of collaboration and correspondence with a plaintiff in Virginia constituted purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting business in the forum state
• finding that an Indian entity being haled into Virginia court was not particularly burdensome when the entity had secured counsel to represent its interests there
• holding the second prong of the specific jurisdiction inquiry met where contacts are “the genesis of this dispute”
• holding the second prong of the specific jurisdiction inquiry met where contacts are “the genesis of this dispute”
• noting that the defendant’s visit to the plaintiff’s office in Virginia was the “genesis of [this] dispute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).