Aggarao v. MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff was not entitled to raise a public-policy defense “until the second stage of the arbitration-related court proceedings— the award-enforcement stage”
• holding that a plaintiff was not entitled to raise a public-policy defense “until the second stage of the arbitration-related court proceedings—the award-enforcement stage”
• holding that “the [9 U.S.C.] § 1 exemption does not apply” to a case governed by the Convention Act
• holding that a party to an arbitration agreement and attendant choice-of-law clause could not raise a public-policy defense, which was based on the prospective-waiver doctrine, “until the second stage of the arbitration-related court proceedings — the award-enforcement stage”
• holding that a party to an arbitration agreement and attendant choice-of-law clause could not raise a public-policy defense, which was based on the prospective-waiver doctrine, “until the second stage of the arbitration-related court proceedings—the award-enforcement stage”
• stating that a “district court's failure to recognize that it had discretion is an abuse of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).