Amaro v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Forensic firearm and tool-mark identification evidence is not a new or novel methodology, and its admissibility in criminal cases is well- documented in Florida’s jurisprudence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Philip Jude Moran v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-10

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Frye v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
• Estes v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,725×
• United States v. Richard Hicks
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-12-07· cited 197×
• Coolen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-05-22· cited 85×
• Hardwick v. Crosby
  Eleventh Circuit· 2003-01-31· cited 76×
• Chavez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-06-25· cited 40×
• Barwick v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-30· cited 30×
• Foster v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-10-17· cited 28×
• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-02-09· cited 26×
• Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-10-15· cited 20×
• Richards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-30· cited 17×
• State v. Town of Sweetwater
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-26· cited 15×
• Lebron v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-21· cited 14×
• Butler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-30· cited 4×