State v. Town of Sweetwater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “When faced with a purported Anders brief, this Court may not review the merits of the underlying issues without first passing on the request to withdraw[]”
• stating, “[w]hen faced with a purported Anders brief, this Court may not review the merits of the underlying issues without first passing on the request to withdraw”
• stating, “[w]hen faced with a purported Anders brief, this Court may not -2- J-S06009-23 review the merits of the underlying issues without first passing on the request to withdraw”
• stating, “When faced with a purported Anders brief, this Court may not review the 3 See In re J.T., 983 A.2d 771, 774 (Pa. Super. 2009) (holding that decision of counsel to follow Pa.R.A.P. 1925(c)(4) procedure in termination of parental rights case was proper
• “‘When faced with a purported Anders brief, this Court may not review the merits of the underlying issues without first passing on the request to withdraw.’”
• “‘When faced with a purported Anders brief, this Court may not review the merits of the underlying issues without first passing on the request to withdraw.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).