Skip to main content
· 12/7/2004

United States v. Richard Hicks

Citations

  • 389 F.3d 514
  • 2004 WL 2450951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding expert firearm comparison testing methodology reliable under Daubert standard and thus, admissible
  • malice aforethought involves “extreme recklessness and wanton disregard for human life” (emphasis added)
  • malice aforethought involves “extreme recklessness and wanton disregard for human life” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Smith, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.