Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/17/1978
Wolff v. Wolff
Citations
- 389 A.2d 413
- 40 Md. App. 168
- 100 A.L.R. 3d 779
- 1978 Md. App. LEXIS 255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[E]quity courts have jurisdiction to enforce the alimony provisions of a foreign country decree which is subject to recognition in this State”
- “[A] foreign decree is presumed valid until some evidence to the contrary is presented”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Davidson, Melvin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. HarmooshFourth Circuit· 2017-02-02· cited 144×
- Guinness Plc Guinness America, Incorporated v. Thomas Joseph Ward, (Two Cases)Fourth Circuit· 1992-03-10· cited 108×
- Telnikoff v. MatusevitchCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-10· cited 53×
- Syncrude Canada Ltd. v. Highland Consulting Group, Inc.D. Maryland· 2013-01-10· cited 32×
- Boyter v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1980-08-06· cited 14×
- S.A. Andes v. Versant Corporation First Washington Investments Corporation Thomas F. HerrFirst Circuit· 1989-07-31· cited 13×
- Apenyo v. ApenyoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-02· cited 6×
- Bang v. ParkMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-05-04· cited 5×
- Don Docksteader Motors, Ltd. v. Patal Enterprises, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-08-31· cited 4×
- Leitch v. LeitchSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-03-14· cited 3×
- In Re Marriage of LyustigerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-09-29· cited 3×
- Iraq Middle Market Development v. Mohammad HarmooshFourth Circuit· 2020-01-13· cited 3×
- Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. HarmooshD. Maryland· 2016-03-30· cited 1×
- Findlay v. FindlayMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1996-09-09
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 1,048×
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court· 1859-03-11· cited 538×
- Litvaitis v. LitvaitisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-03-22· cited 85×
- Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumNew York Court of Appeals· 1955-12-01· cited 85×
- Pawley v. PawleySupreme Court of Florida· 1950-04-06· cited 75×
- Zalduendo v. ZalduendoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-01-13· cited 41×
- Tonti v. ChadwickSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1949-03-07· cited 40×
- McCabe v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-06-15· cited 38×
- Altman v. AltmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-05· cited 28×
- Nardi v. SegalAppellate Court of Illinois· 1967-12-27· cited 25×
- Butler v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1968-03-15· cited 17×
- Growe v. GroweMichigan Court of Appeals· 1965-12-20· cited 11×
- Hammond v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-09-09· cited 9×
- In Re KarolCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-03-12· cited 7×
- Roberts v. RobertsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1956-09-12· cited 5×
- Tailby v. TailbyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1951-04-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.