Hudson v. Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Justice Traynor's opinion for the court explained divisible divorce and that an ex parte divorce in Idaho did not foreclose a subsequent proceeding in California for alimony
• Justice Traynor's opinion for the court explained divisible divorce and that an ex parte divorce in Idaho did not foreclose a subsequent proceeding in California for alimony
• “Of the thirty-three jurisdictions that have passed on this question, twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have held that a wife may obtain support or alimony following the entry of an ex parte divorce”.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-08-06· cited 149×
• Waite v. Waite
  California Supreme Court· 1972-01-14· cited 88×
• Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2009-12-29· cited 70×
• Davey v. Los Angeles County Bureau of Adoptions
  California Supreme Court· 1960-07-01· cited 61×
• In Re Marriage of Van Sickle
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-03-30· cited 40×
• Hull v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1960-05-13· cited 37×
• In Re Marriage of Fink
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-01-14· cited 33×
• Altman v. Altman
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-05· cited 28×
• Davis v. Davis
  California Supreme Court· 1968-02-28· cited 25×
• Snider v. Snider
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-07-09· cited 21×
• In Re Marriage of Leff
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-05-17· cited 19×
• Lopez v. Lopez
  California Supreme Court· 1965-12-23· cited 18×
• Weber v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1960-01-19· cited 17×
• Irwin v. Irwin
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-04-25· cited 14×
• Brown v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1978-09-20· cited 13×
• Cochran v. Cochran
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-12-08· cited 12×
• Bierl v. McMahon
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-02-25· cited 12×
• In Re Marriage of Ford
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-03-15· cited 10×
• Kresteller v. Superior Court of S.F.
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-02-15· cited 10×
• See v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1961-02-03· cited 10×

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Williams v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 1,048×
• Williams v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 1,003×
• Estin v. Estin
  Supreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 608×
• Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt
  Supreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 348×
• Esenwein v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Esenwein
  Supreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 179×
• Fleischman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1950-10-23· cited 159×
• Worthley v. Worthley
  California Supreme Court· 1955-04-28· cited 97×
• DeYoung v. DeYoung
  California Supreme Court· 1946-01-29· cited 76×
• Pawley v. Pawley
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1950-04-06· cited 75×
• Armstrong v. Armstrong
  Supreme Court· 1956-05-21· cited 71×
• Bates v. Bodie
  Supreme Court· 1918-01-21· cited 68×
• Baldwin v. Baldwin
  California Supreme Court· 1946-06-25· cited 68×
• Galland v. Galland
  California Supreme Court· 1869-07-01· cited 68×
• Colbert v. Colbert
  California Supreme Court· 1946-05-28· cited 66×
• Kalmus v. Kalmus
  California Court of Appeal· 1951-04-12· cited 56×
• Dietrich v. Dietrich
  California Supreme Court· 1953-09-25· cited 46×
• Hite v. Hite
  California Supreme Court· 1899-05-13· cited 45×
• Cardinale v. Cardinale
  California Supreme Court· 1937-05-26· cited 44×
• Toncray v. Toncray
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1910-09-15· cited 43×
• Woodhouse v. Woodhouse
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1955-02-14· cited 37×