All Seasons Services, Inc. v. Guildner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• approving of clarification because “[c]on-trary to the defendant’s contention, the arbitrator’s letter did not modify any substantive content of the original award, but merely explained its meaning”
• “[Permitting an arbitrator to issue a clarification unilaterally is consistent with the purpose of arbitration to serve as an efficient and cost effective means of dispute resolution.”
• court properly remanded matter to arbitrator for clarification after one party filed timely request to confirm award
• a court must remand an award that is ambiguous; an award is ambiguous if it is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation
• hold- ing that court improperly disregarded arbitrator’s artic- ulation of award and that ‘‘arbitrator’s judgment that a clarification was warranted is to be given deference by the court’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).