Skip to main content
· 6/13/1995

Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Clc, Local 182b v. Excelsior Foundry Company

Citations

  • 56 F.3d 844
  • 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2538
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14571
  • 1995 WL 351647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that neither the AAA Rules nor functus officio barred an arbitrator from clarifying his award to explain which party was responsible for the costs of a rehabilitative program
  • noting that the functus officio doctrine “[t]oday, [is] riddled with exceptions ... [and] is hanging on by its fingernails”
  • holding that uncertainty in an arbitration award Agreement
  • remanding the issue of backpay to the arbitrator when the employee was not reinstated because the award was challenged
  • functus officio doctrine is “riddled with exceptions ... [and] is hanging on by its fingernails”
  • “An ex 2 parte conduct is not an automatic ground for invalidating” an arbitration award.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Eschbach, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.