Daniel v. Green v. Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “‘findings of fact’ and ‘conclusions of law’ are familiar terms in legal parlance with reasonably plain meanings”
• holding “ ‘findings of fact’ and ‘conclusions of law’ are familiar terms in legal parlance with reasonably plain meanings”
• stating that remand allows the arbitrator to complete his duties- by clarifying his reasoning, and would not implicate any of the concerns underlying the functus officio doctrine
• noting that the “[t]he weight of authority clearly supports dismissal of the case when all of the issues raised in the district court must be submitted to arbitration”
• noting that if remand was warranted, remand would be to original arbitrator because he would simply be completing his duties by clarifying his reasoning, not reopening the merits of the case
• reversing vacatur of six-page arbitration award on grounds that while minimal, it was nevertheless adequate to satisfy agreement requiring arbitrator to “explain” award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).