Skip to main content
· 4/2/2013

Edward Hines Sigler v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Citations

  • 61 Va. App. 674
  • 739 S.E.2d 272
  • 2013 WL 1294418
  • 2013 Va. App. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court did not abuse discretion in awarding restitution and noting defendant could have asked victim to produce list she made showing the value of her stolen property or for continuance to review victim’s list, but “did nothing”
  • reciting rule that court may consider reliable hearsay in determining amount of restitution
  • reciting rule that court may consider reliable hearsay in determining amount of restitution
  • first quoting Deal v. Commonwealth, 15 Va. App. 157, 160 (1992); then quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 274 Va. 733, 735 (2007)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank, Prank, Huff, Chapin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.