Skip to main content

Alexander v. State

Citations

  • 88 S.W.3d 772
  • 2002 WL 1998144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although the State did not spend a great deal of time proving up the seizure of the weapon, the factors weighed against admission
  • holding that, although the State did not spend a great deal of time proving up the seizure of the weapon, the factors weighed against admission
  • concluding that trial court erred by overruling objections to admission of mug shot from extraneous offense under Rules of Evidence
  • the firearm seized pursuant to arrest had the potential to impress the jury in an irrational manner
  • the firearm seized pursuant to arrest had the potential to impress the jury in an irrational manner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Dorsey and Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.